Lord of the Flies Essay

In the fresh Lord of the go, the author places a convention of children in a situation where thither are no grown ups to invite them. On an island, far apart from civilisation, it is up to the schoolboys to march a unexampled society with new rules, so that they base live together. unless their attempt at an ordered look register soon falls apart and distributively of them is driven by an inner beast, which tempts them into evil. The smart suggests that even though man has evolved ein truthplace the centuries, becoming civilized and leaving the spelunk for the city, the brute(a) within him still remains. precipitous from the restrictions of society, he slips back into a life where the reinforced dominate by means of fear, and there is no place for the weak otherwise than as blind followers. It raises a very simple yet important interrogative sentence do the strong eternally bear the weak? Hunting is one light-colored theme from the text, which implies that the authors adjudicate to this question is yes. Since the beginning, the boys get classed according to their specialization Ralph is chosen as the chief, the littluns are left(a) to themselves, Piggy and Simon are largely snub and dickhead amazes the leader of the courseers. goofball wants to be the one to provide meat for the tribe. Yet, as time goes by, he seems to become more obsessed by the thrill of cleanup spot, intent a compulsion to track fling off and kill that is swallowing him up. When the boys hunt the sow nursling its fuzzlets, they choose the weakest and about innocent of preys. The killing is described almost as a sexual act indicating the amount of sport it gave them Then Jack found the throat and the hot blood spouted over his hands. The sow collapsed under them and they were heavy and fulfilled upon her.In the islands government, Jack in any case designs his situation to combat injury the weak to establish his authority. He shows off his hunti ng skills to convince the boys that he will be a give leader and give better shield against the feeble. When Roger kills Piggy, Jack screams, See? See? Thats what youll get His set of laws is enforced through fear and punishment, and even when Ralph is alone and defenceless, he wants to hunt him down and kill him. Although Jack and Roger are the most obvious examples of strong digesting the weak, most of the other boys also have the same sense.Kill the pig Cut his throat Kill the pig Bash him in they chant as they act out their hunt almost the bonfire and do a savage dance. The per fixance seems to carry them into a spellbinding trance, which leads to the vicious killing of Simon. By the demolition of the novel, even the littluns have gone wild. Carried away by fear and violence, they join the hunt for Ralph. It is easy to see that Lord of the Flies reflects a very pessimistic view of sympathetic nature. The author seems to judge that the entrust to hurt the weak is an i nherent instinct in man.The thesis definitely holds lawful in the population showed in the book. moreover to fully understand whether it is true or not, it is important to apply it to the real world as well. There are infinite examples in everyday life and history that support the thesis question. In 1996, the sports accessories demon Nike was hauled to court for exploiting children under sixteen to exert in their sweatshops in Indonesia (Harsono, 1996). Not and now was the company breaking Child pains Laws, it was making the children work like slaves in terrible working conditions.They were being remunerative the official minimum wage, which was less that $2. 17 per day allowing Nike to make exorbitant profits. Children form the weakest section of human society and wherefore are often hurt and exploited. tho they in turn, can also become the tormentor for others weaker than themselves. We have all seen kids throwing stones at helpless dogs or stamping on ants except fo r fun. Playgrounds are filled with bullies who torment the meek. As Golding would say, the instinct to hurt seems to be expose in us from birth.In other sensational example of state victimisation their power to abuse the weak, The Independent (Coonan, 2006) deep featured an article revealing the modelling couch in the Chinese get industry. A Chinese actress Zhang Yu had blown the spill the beans on a number of noted directors and producers who only agreed to give roles in exchange for sex. And this is not an uncommon scenario. animation seems to be full of people who use their power to get what they want from those in their control. A recent film, The Hostel, explores this desire to hurt in humans, exposing it as a sickness.It is approximately a different kind of prostitution, where the impotent victims are sold to buyers who get diversion torturing them. The movie shows the beast in human nature at its worst. And the most terrifying is that the writer claims that its storyline is base on reports of true incidents. Yet, despite such(prenominal) strong evidence of support, one cant help but develop Goldings worldview to be slightly dark-skinned as there are mickle of examples, which contradict it as well. It is true that people equal who enjoy hurting the weak. exactly it is also true that people exist who devote their entire life to defend them.To accept unconditionally that the strong always want to harm the helpless, is to forget the pose Theresas and the Nelson Mandelas of this world. The thesis ignores the human rights workers, lawyers, medical aid who work tirelessly for the cause of the weak. In the Genesis (1 1-25), God is said to take a leak light and darkness, water and earth, bird and beast. And so, just as there is evil, there is also good. It is a duality that is inherent in life. Is the desire to hurt the weak rude(a) in man? In the ideational world of the Lord of the Flies the dish out is yes.But in real life, the ejec t is too complex for so unconditional an answer. We cannot arrive at the truth by simply ignoring the better side of human nature and considering only the worst or vice versa. Goldings outlook is all-embracing and too generalized. The novel itself gives the first source of doubt in the form of Simon. He helps the littluns collect fruit to eat. For every Jack in this world, there exists at least(prenominal) one Simon. If it were a universal truth that deep down all humans feel a desire to hurt the weak, his presence would be hard to explain indeed.Referencehttp//www.albionmonitor.com/9606a/nikelabor.html